Current events oddly compel me to once again broach the subject of the newly most hated man in America: Richard Spencer. But this time the topic isn’t the man, but his mother. America is currently in the throes of a gripping drama known (by me) as “Richard Spencer’s Mom-gate.”
Most readers probably know the story. Richard Spencer’s mother lives in a small town in Montana. As Richard manages to get himself in the news quite a bit, his mother is increasingly being harassed by a predominantly Jewish local group. This consists of a shrewish Jewish real estate agent and a http://hstrebatestoronto.com/?p=educational-goals-essay puzzlingly too-much-time-on-his-hands reform Rabbi, as well as others in a group ironically titled “Love Lives Here” that are determined to protest the fact that Richard Spencer has a Mom he loves who dares to live there.
Clearly, Spencer should either not have a Mom, or if he has to, she should live somewhere where there are no people to be offended by her existence. Maybe 20 miles east, up on a glacier. But not in a beautiful town named Whitefish (which, by the way, is the exact type of fish my own Mom uses in her homemade gefilte fish).
Unfortunately, Spencer does have what appears to be a nice and reasonable mother who stands by her son despite disagreeing with and publicly disavowing his political views, which is exactly what I’d imagine my mother would do if she ever knew I wrote for The Occidental Observer. Richard Spencer’s Mom doesn’t understand her son’s views, and has absolutely no affiliation with any of his projects. Yet somehow, the mere fact of their relation is enough to trigger some of Whitefish’s small Jewish community into trying to bully her into selling her property and donating some of the money to their organization.
This is all even more odd since Richard Spencer is not generally a fierce critic of Jews. From what I’ve read, I think he probably thinks that in an ideal world, most or all Jews should move to Israel. Many Israelis think this as well, but nobody’s harassing their Moms about it. My guess is that the Whitefishers follow Spencer news quite closely and were re-triggered by the recent media manufactured go to link “hailgate”.
Things got weirder when the Daily Stormer’s Andrew Anglin got involved. I don’t care much for the Daily Stormer and they wouldn’t care much for me. They would call me names like kike and probably suggest I be put in an oven, or they’d accuse me of entryism and say I shouldn’t be trusted because I’m a dirty Jew (I’m actually clean). Regardless of our differences (I have a higher IQ), I and some other Jews I know enjoy occasionally reading the Stormer. In an era where trolling has been elevated to an art-form and form of mass entertainment, even Jewish trolls respect goyish master trolls.
Anglin wrote a series of posts calling for action against the people harassing Richard Spencer’s mom. He included their names and contact information and in my opinion, showed a serious moral lapse in making fun of and urging harassment of one of the targets’ children. Nobody ever accused the Stormer of subtlety, kindness, or good taste. Later, as the trolling intensified, Anglin announced his intention to utilize Montana’s open carry laws and launch an anti-Jewish march through the town toting rifles. As an aside, anybody remember the days when the ACLU would have jumped to protect something like that?
At this point the hysteria reached a fever pitch. see Montana’s politicians wrote a letter decrying the looming assault of “white supremacists” on their Whitefish. In the comment section of the Washington Post story Jews and sympathetic non-Jews responded with fear and rage. Anglin, as usual, provoked a mighty Storm. The concept of “don’t feed the trolls” seems completely lost on these people. Or maybe manufactured outrage is necessary when you’re posturing as a tolerant, progressive type — the type who would destroy a woman’s business and ostracize her because she dared to give birth to someone who thinks differently than you do.
All of this is sort of funny, and sad, but mainly painfully insane. As everybody works themselves into a lather worrying about the 200 white supremacist marchers (with guns!) coming to menace the poor snow-Jews of the Bitterroot, somehow nobody remembers that these Montanan ice-Jews actually started this. Richard Spencer’s Mom wasn’t doing anything but being Richard Spencer’s Mom. Moms have a right to be Moms and live in the towns they live in.
What we have here are some progressive-liberal Jews assuming that that they have the right to “get rid of hate” by being mean-spirited and hateful, and then shrieking about it when their bullying and harassment produces mean-spirited harassment back. There’s an old Polish saying popular in Stormer circles: “the Jew cries out in pain as he strikes you.” I don’t like this saying much but you can’t tell me it isn’t apropos here.
So thanks, mountain Jews. link Once again, Spencer is right, and now, even Andrew Anglin is right. I don’t much like Anglin’s rhetoric or tactics but he is not the main villain in this picture. There is one primary victim here — Mom. There is one primary villain here — the Jews who chose, without justification, to harass her. It would have been easy to just not pay any attention to Mrs. Spencer and let her live her life. Even now, I’m sure an apology and pledge to stop harassing her would end this all immediately. But that would mean the people responsible would have to stop playing the victim. And herein lies the problem.
What this episode shows is that while Jews are not always the victims, they will invariably pretend to be, particularly when there are energetic trolls around to goad them on. Here, these particular Jews were clearly the aggressors. And what that suggests to those able to get a glimpse behind the curtain is that maybe, just maybe, Jews really aren’t generally victims these days at all.
“Human life is a comedy- one must play it seriously.” – Alexandre Kojeve
“[H]umour is itself but a superficial view of that which is in truth both tragic and terrible—the contrast between human pretence and cosmic mechanical reality…. the faint terrestrial echo of the hideous laughter of the blind mad gods… the world is indeed comic, but the joke is on mankind.” -HP Lovecraft
“Above all, beware of falling into caricature. Nothing ought to be exaggerated or hackneyed, not even the minor roles. On the contrary, the actor must make a special effort to be more modest, unpretentious, and dignified than the character he is playing. help essay writing nursing The less the actor thinks about being funny or making the audience laugh, the more the comic elements of his part will come through. Professional Cv Writing Service The ridiculous will emerge spontaneously through the very seriousness with which each character is occupied with his own affairs... link Only the audience, from its detached position, can perceive the vanity of their concerns. But they themselves do not joke at all and having no inkling that anybody is laughing at them.” – Gogol
I: History is a narrative, from the greek http://www.alamanauae.com/shorya-awtar-phd-thesis/ shorya awtar phd thesis historia. We are its http://retard-de-regles.com/i-need-an-dissertation-writier-statement-on-abortion/ histriones, actors. The common root is ἵστωρ, histor; the witness or the wise-man, from whom History is created. History is indeed a creation, a project. It is a depiction of a sequence of events in which each event gains meaning in accordance to its place within the totality of depicted events. In order to think and write historically, one must place oneself outside of this totality and inspect it from an alienated viewpoint. One must become spectral in order to view the totality of the spectacle; a “transparent eyeball” capable of viewing the human archive of space-time. Consequently, any particular interpretation of history is an aesthetic project itself, which attempts to portray truthfully the tone and telos of the totality of human affairs. This http://www.cgmediagroup.com/a-phd-research-proposal/ mustbe the case. It is a necessity. Even histories that reject this task are apophatically silhouetting their understanding, albeit they do so unconsciously. It is the job of the critic to depict the occulted aesthetic of “objective history.” We can easily summon our American History; the ideological narrative of the founding fathers, slavery, the civil war. We know that there are various apologetics for various figures. We know that this story has changed over time. But we must not delude ourselves. There can be no http://augustform.com/essay-with-spatial-order/ science of history as history is an http://profisvet.com/do-my-english-paper/ art. There is no escaping this. History is a narrative.
II: This narrative takes on different moods depending on the Historian’s aesthetic judgement regarding the totality of human affairs. The Historian watches it as a stage-play taking place college narrative essay outside of himself. He can interpret it as a comedy; as a tragedy; or as a serious endeavor. The Tragicomic dialectic is predicated on the B-Theory of Time; that the linear flow of Time is an anthropocentric illusion; as Comedy and Tragedy are only possible in a universe that repeats itself inexorably. It is this repetition show my homework ossma itself that is tragicomic, not any given repetition. It is impossible to take endless repetition as serious-work. Endless repetition without “progress” toward some end is equivalent to madness, insanity; itself a tragicomic affair. The endless oscillations of world-souls rising and falling from civilization as depicted by a totalizing historian such as Spengler cannot, by definition, have a telos; as it is a procession of failed telos after failed telos. It is only the historian who does not believe in the possibility of such an alienated position that can interpret the sum of human action as serious-work. This is the Historian who believes that his position is not http://popyentradas.com/essay-papers-essay-papers/ alien. This Historian believes that the audienceis the most important part of the play. This position is only possible under the A-Theory of Time; in which there is never repetition; only the illusion of repetition. To such a Historian, no play is ever, in truth, repeated. He is a Heraclitus claiming that one can never revisit a river. In this model, only the past and the present exist, while the future is wholly subject to the will of Man and other forces. I claim that this is hubris. A historical horizon for man beyond the death of the universe is sheer pride. However, this is the view most widely held. It is also the view that makes the Tragicomic dialectic possible.
A tweet from conservative media icon Matt Drudge’s verified Twitter account Thursday night appeared to accuse the government of interfering with his website,, just hours after the Barack Obama administration announced new sanctions against Russia over election hacking.
“Is the US government attacking DRUDGE REPORT? Biggest DDoS since site’s inception. VERY suspicious routing [and timing],” the tweet to Drudge’s 457,000 followers read. There were no other tweets from the account at the time.
A large-scale distributed denial of service attack, or DDoS, can cause major Internet disruptions. In the past, such attacks have shut down major websites such as Twitter, Spotify, Netflix, Amazon, Tumblr, and Reddit. The attack sends a server many illegitimate requests to make it hard for real requests to get through, effectively shutting down the site.
Drudge Report was down briefly around 7 p.m. EST, but working hours later. The top headline read: “MOSCOW MOCKS OBAMA ‘LAME DUCK'” Meanwhile, the conservative Washington Times wrote: “Matt Drudge suggests U.S. government cyberattack on Drudge Report website. DDoS attack comes same day Obama announced countermeasures against Russia for hacking of Democrats.”
Conservatives on Twitter also accused the government of shutting down the Russian news website, RT. “Numerous reports of Russian state-run Network RT being unavailable. Drudge Report also under ‘Biggest DDoS attack since site’s inception,'” wrote one user.
President Barack Obama announced Thursday sanctions against several Russian agencies and individuals after cyberattacks during the 2016 presidential election against Democratic Party institutions that appeared to help Donald Trump win over Hillary Clinton.
“All Americans should be alarmed by Russia’s actions. In October, my administration publicized our assessment that Russia took actions intended to interfere with the U.S. election process,” Obama said. “These data theft and disclosure activities could only have been directed by the highest levels of the Russian government. Moreover, our diplomats have experienced an unacceptable level of harassment in Moscow by Russian security services and police over the last year. Such activities have consequences.”
Government officials have wrangled with Drudge before over his alleged false claims. With 2 million daily unique visitors and around 700 million monthly page views, was the top site for referral traffic in 2014 to the Daily Mail, CNN, Fox News, Roll Call, Breitbart, The New York Times, USA Today, Associated Press and other news sites. Its readers were loyal, staying on the site for an average of 30 minutes, Politico reported.
“People are religious in how they come to Drudge,” Vipul Mistry, Intermarket’s Business Development manager, told Politico’s On Media blog. “When we analyzed all our audience that’s what it is, people are on there not only in morning, they tend to leave it open as it refreshes.”