Oct 15 (2 days ago)
Cecil Ronson – Plasma Labs (not found sp?)
Lowell Morgan – Experimental Plasma
Garret Hill – Alfven
Typical Alfvén Waves
Kinetic Alfvén Waves
Alfven Nobel Speech – MHD
When I describe the [plasma phenomena] according to this formulism most referees do not understand what I say and turn down my papers. With the referee system which rules US science today, this means that my papers are rarely accepted by the leading US journals.
Experimental Plasma Research
New Light – Bias – Mel Acheson – Occam’s Beard – Epistomology
It is in this context that, as Mel writes: “it’s necessary for Ockham to grow a beard of speculations that revolutionizes what we used to know.”
FET – BiPolar Junction – 20s pivotal time
Star Distances – Star Cluster Field of View –
Lorentz nor Poincare
Relativity priority dispute
|Still, neither Lorentz nor Poincare ever whole-heartedly embraced special relativity, for reasons that may best be summed up by Lorentz when he wrote|
|Yet, I think, something may also be claimed in favor of the form in which I have presented the theory. I cannot but regard the aether, which can be the seat of an electromagnetic field with its energy and its vibrations, as endowed with a certain degree of substantiality, however different it may be from all ordinary matter. In this line of thought it seems natural not to assume at starting that it can never make any difference whether a body moves through the aether or not, and to measure distances and lengths of time by means of rods and clocks having a fixed position relatively to the aether.|
Chaos at 50
Super Ultra Specialization – Reductionism –
Red Shift Falicy – Cosmology Quest – Documentary – Eric Lerner – “Big Bang Never Happened Theory – Velvet Hammer – Berbige – Halton Arp Quasars Controversies – Plasma Cosmology – Jans Alfmen – Anthony Peratt – Things in front of things – Doppler Effect – Galaxies – Opposite of what – “Seeing Red”
Gabriel Keleman – Cymatics
Dave Lapoint – 3 Videos – Double Slit experiment – Matter is formed
The VU – Radial Attractors:
7:53 PM (11 hours ago)
Jean and Jim
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 8:13 PM, Juan Calsiano <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Sorry, here is the book.
On 18 October 2017 at 00:09, Juan Calsiano <email@example.com> wrote:
Start with a nice force-free filament as described by the LSBC model. Such an “inviscid” effectively ideal flow can continue to flow without any significant losses for as long as the larger environment allows it to flow.
Now imagine that such a flow, instead of flowing more or less linearly (even if a part of a larger helix), can now start to steeply curl. For example, if you consider the wave-structure aspect of the filament, consider that such filament encounters a steep density gradient that forces the filament to refract towards the density gradient. Imagine that the physical variables that relate to the filament and to the density gradient are of such particular values that the refraction produces the filament “wave front” to make a ring and thus perfectly join a previous part of the filament, not unlike an ouroboros. A stable self-sustaining discrete layered toroidal force-free structure is born.Now check out the images on page 147 (and onwards) on the attached book.
You may want to google a bit about these Beltrami vortices.In fluid dynamics, Beltrami flows are flows in which the vorticity vector and the velocity vector are parallel to each other.
On force-free magnetic fields and beltrami flowsSolenoidal vector fields, which satisfy the condition that the field vector everywhere parallels to its curl, have complex topological structures, and usually show chaotic behaviors. In this paper, analytical solutions for vector fields with constant proportional factor in three basic coordinate systems are presented and it is pointed out that a Beltrami flow can sustain a steady force-free magnetic field in a perfectly conducting fluid, provided the magnetic field is parallel to the velocity everywhere.
On 17 October 2017 at 21:18, Jim Weninger <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:Sorry if I already sent this. (I’m having trouble with my email)The idea here is that the pair of counter rotating pool vortices can not be understood by looking at the plane of the pool’s surface. Could this be true for counter rotating galaxies as well? The question, given observation of galactic “sheets”, is if these are not “sheets”, but in fact “boundaries” between regions of different plasma density. Plasma does seem to behave this way here maybe: (???)
Oct 8 (9 days ago)
Jean and Juan,
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 7:54 PM, Jim Weninger <email@example.com> wrote:
Here is an image of the sun, in the local clouds. The mainstream describes the sun’s motion as “skimming the surface” of our cloud, but also doing so in the region between two adjacent clouds. http://www.dailygalaxy.com/.
a/6a00d8341bf7f753ef01b7c7201e 0b970b-piThose clouds themselves, are imbedded in the “shells” shown hereSo that might put the sun in a similar situation as the sphere in the coke can
This Geometry keep coming to mind – as I read your email:
On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 8:36 AM, don mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
David, here’s the windy email I asked if you wanted to read….
I was amazed to see your earlier image-version during our talk, like the output graphic you sent, except is was more ‘mature,’ looking like two spheres with the banding, separated by a small amount where a tiny hourglass resides. 1/r gravity model can’t do that with a planet at center. Particles accelerate and pass-through center to transform (over time, evolve over time) from one sphere to two spheres of banded surface element-density. First blush brings to mind that perhaps the ether matrix could host the transformation of a spherical charge (dielectric) into striated, dual spheres (dipole magnetism), with some separation. Just by iterating 1/r. Still amazed.
Here is the sunflower chemical-oscillator spiral auxin thing I had posted, in my Fibonacci page: http://portal.groupkos.com/ind
That is an excerpt from American Physical Society, ‘Synopsis: How Plants Do Their Math.’ What I explained isn’t there, as a chemical oscillator pulsing as a function of a growth-vector (auxin distribution affects growth per region). I either read it while researching, or imagined it.
Warning Will Robinson! Alien text approaching!
You asked how I would go about testing the star-collapse analogy (in copper). I talked about the conductive loops of a torus knot that are analogous to the rotating AND compressing, in-rolling, shrinking torus topology within the volume of the (spinning) collapsing stellar plasma medium, with plasma rivers as torus knots of some degree. A nifty sub-analogy happens between the thunderous sonic vibrations of the scalar (sonic) medium of the collapsing star plasma (extreme pressurized chaos), and the timing-noise within the rotary step-phase pulse-timing.
While I can test for natural resonant frequency in a torus knot, after mastering measurement technique on simpler circular loops, and radial arrays of loops slanted to the Villarceau angle (like that copper loop thing I built), I hope to investigate the higher-order sub-harmonics that are driven by the impulse of random thunder-claps of the star analogy – or in copper, the timing jitter of the phase-stepped pulse driver for the ring-array of resonant conductors. That is, when over-driven (thunderously), the copper resonator selects higher frequencies of harmonic multiples above the fundamental resonance, while all frequency components are simultaneously the same resonant topology (resonant magnetic topology assumes charge-surfaces (voltage patterns) created by induced dielectric charge).
If I continue to live long enough, resonant studies then tweak a sequence of data-driven design iterations/tests to illuminate what happens to a 3D resonant structure that has a magnetic disconnect within the resonant surface. That is the inner and outer loops that are magnetically disconnected in the orthogonal torus knot, when electrically juvenated. Will the square Phi knot achieve a level of resonance within the inner windings before or after the outer loops fall into a resonant dwell? Will both inner and outer knot windings have resonant frequencies (coherent structures) that are inter-related? Or have independent frequency-sets?
I hope to discover, in my penultimate pipe-dream, how to develop a resonator with a torus knot step-rotary array that energizes in bifilar fashion (self-cancelling current symmetry) to form a magnetic torus/vortex with a dielectric-charge center, while the coherent structure is encapsulated in an outer-charge of the opposite polarity. Some tricks required (a 2D skyrmion in a thin film at the torus plane, or in a metallic nano-crystal random surface, or such) to seed an normally impossible coherent structure (structurally-assisted strain-organized field assembly). The final versions of small coils may need power levels perhaps over ten thousand Watts to sufficiently overdrive a bifilar winding into dipolar resonance. Rather than chasing the higher wattage versions (needed for more power) with faster/bigger transistors, the spiral-wound capacitive-inductor patents describe how to develop a very-high-voltage push-pull resonator that can be controlled/switched/dialed by digital logic over common driver transistors, which logic is the ring-oscillator of the noisy rotary square Phi knot array thingie.
Oh boy. That’s a load. Thanks for asking 🙂
p.s If the radial velocity of the magnetic rotation of a square Phi device at scale produces a propagation of magnetic density change, per Znidarsic’s theory based on real, measured data, at or near to Znidarsic’s velocity (1.094 mega-meter-seconds), then nuclear field (matter near field) effects may emerge within the resonant field, which could be both disastrous and wonderful. Differently, the near field of the atomic matrix of a copper resonator may structuralize a magnetic resonance at one certain frequency, per the scale of the device. Aim: formation of a macro-giant 3D skyrmion (a magnetic vortex with a dielectric charge on center, a charge-carrying magnetic macro boson). This sums the most of my alien science career, minus the star mind stuff and assorted woo-woo subjections.
Another great meetup last week.
Notes from last week:
Great meetup again last week.
Ran across this info through Don Mitchel.
Thought it might contribute to the conversation.
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: David W. Johnson <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 10:15 AM
Subject: Bergson’s Holographic Theory – 18 – Tesla and the Ether
To: don mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Ran across this last night,
Interested in your take on it:
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:54 AM, don mitchell <email@example.com> wrote:
Join the resistance (humor)
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 9:33 AM, don mitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Thanks for the post-chat email with links about our talk. That helps my neurons. The tree of dodecadhedral twins is fascinating, looking graphically similar to x-ray diffraction patterns through crystals. Thanks for the gimbling illustrations.
I thought you may appreciate the speculation by Neil below on a density-increase of the local aether within our solar system, which he cites as evident by a now permanent halo around the moon.
His long-time site is http://worlds-within-worlds.org/.
Neil is a sensitive (as in telepathic-ish) trained by an American Indian shawoman (lady shaman). I’ve never met him in person or talked to him. We’ve traded emails over the years, and he keeps me on at least some of his mailings as a BCC recipient, usually. I think his mathematical physics centers around Russian spinor theory (aether matrix), and claims to have the proper answer. He is degreed in computer science.
cheers – don
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: Robert Neil Boyd Ph D <email@example.com>
Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:47 AM
Subject: The Sun is now radiating Rainbow Lights
To: “David G. Yurth” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dr Jon ‘Xue Zhang’ Jang Ph.D” <email@example.com>, “Dr. Adrian Klein” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dr. Sergey N. Arteha,” <email@example.com>, Florentin Smarandache <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Frank Demuro, CEO, PBTC” <email@example.com>, Gene Nassoiy Barbour <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Helmut Hansen <email@example.com>, Huping Hu <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Ivars Fabriciuss <email@example.com>, “Ji Hao,” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Luca Bianchi <email@example.com>, Louis Malklaka <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Pierre-Marie Robitaille <email@example.com>, “Prof. Andre K. T. Assis,” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Prof. Stephan J. G. Gift” <email@example.com>, “Prof. Zifeng Li” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Volodymyr Krasnoholovets <email@example.com>, Wallace Thornhill <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: Bialek Szczepan <email@example.com>, Bonny Willow <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Byoung Ha Ahn <email@example.com>, firstname.lastname@example.org, Daniel Hirsch <email@example.com>, DonEMitchell <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dr. Angelo A Toriello” <email@example.com>, “Dr. Edward Henry Dowdye, Jr.” <firstname.lastname@example.org>, “Dr. Neal Graneau” <email@example.com>, Francesca Intini <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Greg Volk <email@example.com>, Hu Chang-Wei <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Jean Wood Gupta <email@example.com>, Jesse Going <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Quique Barletta <email@example.com>, Wendy Zammit <firstname.lastname@example.org>
If you will look at a smooth reflective surface with some curvature to it and catch the reflection of the sun at the proper angle, you will easily see movingrainbow “spikes” which are radiating from and involved with the sun.
This is a new phenomenon and is directly related to direct and recorded observations of the years-long rainbow ring around the full moon and the rainbow rings around all manner of human-made light fixtures, in my opinion. These are not the intermittent rainbow rings from decades past, but PERMANENT and globally observable rainbow rings. The ring around the moon is always there now, and this is not at all the rare event it used to be 50 to 100 years ago.
Notice the spikes of light radiating from the central moon circle. I think these are directly connected to the properties of the sunlight that the moon is reflecting to us.
I think these newly observed rainbow sun-spikes are due the same kind of aether density increase which has been causing lunar rainbow rings, intensifying in its influence so that now the effect is directly observable in sun-reflections. I am of the opinion that these rainbow lights are due to increased aether density associated with shells of increased aether density which every galaxy throws off periodically in events known as quantized red shifts.
Due to astrophysical observations of the periodicity of galactic quantized red shifts, I predicted several years ago that the fine structure constant would be changing in value in the future, and indeed it has been changing in its measured value for several years. As the fine structure constant is changing, so too are the fundamental laws of physics are changing.
When the shell of increased aether density has passed entirely through the solar system, at the other side of the shell, the laws of physics will be observed to have been altered permanently in our vicinity in the galaxy.
As I have said before, there are no constants. There are only locally reliable average values which are not long-lived in their purview. Experiment has proved that Planck’s “constant” is not a constant. The force due to gravitation is not a constant. The speed of light is not a constant. And so on and so forth.
We may make measurements with our instrumentations but we should not expect the observed values of any of the “constants” to be reliable for any projects which require long term precision of the measured values of the various constants. In the short term, the currently measured values of the “constants” are usable in most practical applications, but cannot be expected to hold up, long term.
In concert with all these rainbows involved with all light sources, there is an equally irresistible increase in Harmony and Unity Consciousness factors which is directly influencing all life, human beings included.
It is blatantly obvious that these processes cannot be stopped, and that they will not stop. They are Galactic in scale, and Divinely Caused, in my view.
Jean, Jim and Juan,
Great conversation again last week.
Just want to again extend the invitation for the meeting tomorrow.
Skype meetup on
Monday: September 11, 2017 at
I have some scratch notes and some interesting back and forths from last week:
Here are notes with some links for reference and perusal 🙂
7 principles from which the universe works
all is one
equivalence – as above so below
Ebner Effect PhenoType – 1000 volts per centemeter
Jim Murray Paul Babcock
tesla = provide testimony explain – magnifying effective power – nested resonances – Reactive Watts – Lent to the system – Jim Murray and Paul Babcock
Moses and the
Management of Exodus
Alfred de Grazia
Irving Wolf – 1994 Velacofski symposium
Book Limitation of Thinking – Andy Fitz – EU Duard – Breakout Adam Stewart –
Jadowsky = Row Boat – Peculiar – Done Research –
extinctions Nemesis Star – 26,000 — Up and Down throught the plane of the galaxy – Longer Term Schedule – Catastrophic – Crunden – Long Term Cycles Local Circuitry;
Everything Duardo – Judeo Christian – Catholic Replacement – Moluch – Elohim – Central Chimney – Sheldrake ESP – Andrew Edwins – Clarence King – USGS – Catastrophist
Miles Hutton – Uniformitarian. Louise Agascy… Races created separately. Steven J Gould writer evolution – eugenics –
There was some back and forth discussions
mainstream error in electrodynamics:
The Universe is an intrinsically unified physically extended compressible material substrate, a contiguum with no empty spaces anywhere. The Universe is not “filled with” matter, it is matter and nothing else. You, me and all things are just finite modifications formed from and embedded in such an infinite substance. Temporary waves in the eternal Ocean.
Principles of Light and Color:
from 1878 Edwin D. Babbit
Eric Dollard mentioned it in this interview:
Looking forward to the meeting.
ps: Thought this atomic idea had some helices within helices resonances:
Any topics you’d like to cover I can collate so we can reference them during the meeting.
Have a great Sunday.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:20 AM, Jim Weninger <email@example.com> wrote:
I’ve been reading again “God Star”, and Dwardu definitely had the correlation right, when talking of the sun’s position relative to Taurus and the Pleiades, as being used to mark calendars in ancient times. This is still a tool used by some cultures to mark calendars (the position of the sun relative to the constelation). Then he says also very correctly, “If this turns out to be correct, the association of the Pleiades with this planetary deity requires an explanation since this constellation has no observable connection with the planet Saturn”.So, we have records from ancient times that used the sun in Taurus to mark the calendar, we have cultures in modern times that do the same, and a seeming continuous use in between. Note of course that with precession, the sun’s position drifts over time. Yet when we see a culture that depicts the sun between the horns of the bull, and can trace that culture back to a time when sure enough, that postion of the sun (that’s our current sun to be sure!) between the horns does match their “time”, we still are going to make this about Saturn?Again, if this bull with star/planet between its horns came down to us without context, we could make it about Saturn, or anything we wanted. But the context has always been the same. Ancient peoples as far back as we can trace, (and some still now), use the sun’s position relative to the constellation, to distinguish not only where they are in the year, but where their year is in time compared to other years.Once again, I’m not denying the polar configuration, or Saturn’s position in it. Just that not ALL the mythology handed down to us comes from this one time, or this one event. Basically, all cultures around the world, were aware of precession, and that the sun’s position relative to background constellations was the only way to keep track of longer term cycles. This was common knowledge around the world until the idea was accepted that the world was created mere thousands of years ago. No reason to track where the sun is in the precessional cycle, if the whole universe was not around long enough for even half of one cycle.rom: Juan Calsiano <firstname.lastname@example.org>To: Jim Weninger <email@example.com>
Cc: “firstname.lastname@example.org” <email@example.com>; jhafner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: Taurus History
Hi Jim and all!
That Taurus was first identified as the Bull of Heaven (and not the other way around!) in “Babylonian times” could very well be the case, at least in principle. This doesn’t mean that the Bull of Heaven global archetype was generated at such times, of course.Actually, all of the archetypes (the seemingly outrageous global agreements) are clearly prehistoric, i.e. they reflect memorialized events before the rise of (at least what we understand to be) the first civilizations like the Babylonians. And the Bull of Heaven is one of these archetypes of course, so this would be consistent with the position of all the mytho-historical scholars that argue that the associations of archetypes with constellations came after the proto-planetary deities left the main stage (so to speak).That is, the Bull of Heaven archetype, the Sun God archetype and the intimate connection between these two archetypes were all generated before the association to constellations, an association that absolutely did happen but after the original stimulus (the theater in the sky) was not longer there. Or so is the argument.
Again, in order to reconstruct what actually happened we need very reliable data. Nothing less than that will suffice. In order to extract reliable data from obviously unreliable witnesses, we may learn from forensics the golden rule of prehistorical reconstruction:
“All isolated ancient sources are absolutely unreliable by themselves. Reliable conclusions can only arise from a detailed convergence of global testimony that would otherwise be impossible to exist in the absence of a shared extraordinary natural experience”.The reliable data points that any reasonably scientific reconstruction must include are the “archetypes”, the very detailed yet completely outrageous global patterns. There are hundreds of archetypes, most of them identified by many “mainstream” scholars before Velikovsky and his followers, and not a single of those patterns are understandable in terms of our current skies. Not one of them. Yet each and every one must have an explanation.
A few of the mysterious global archetypes are:1) The Bull of Heaven2) The God / Goddess with Outstretched Arms3) Twin Peaks of the World4) The Cosmic Pillar5) The Cosmic Mountain6) The Ship of Heaven7) The Ship of Day and Night8) The Inverted Ship of Night9) The Heavenly Twins10) The Separation of the Heaven and Earth11) The “Beginning” of TimeEtc.
There are many many other global patterns, like the Serpent / Dragon, the Mother Goddess, the Warrior / Hero, each of the distinct characteristics of the Warrior Hero (the swelling god, god of the underworld, the scarred god, the pupil of the eye), etc.All of these global agreements must be data points in any scientific reconstruction worth their salt. It is the reliable mytho-historical evidence that absolutely makes no sense, but must make sense.But the most fascinating thing is that all these data points are interconnected! The ancient sources demonstrate that the bull of heaven is inseparably connected to the outstretched arms, the twin peaks of the world, the cosmic pillar, etc.In my humble opinion, the unparalleled strength of Dave’s Talbott (and others) argument is that if you postulate just one particular seemingly outrageous configuration in the sky, it seems that you can deduce or “retrodict” most if not all of these global patterns! Even more, many of the interconnections between the different archetypes seem to make immediate sense just by following the physical demands of the hypothesis.
To see how the eleven archetypes that I mentioned above are retrodicted from the so-called “polar configuration”, and more importantly, to see how they interconnect, you can review Discourses of an Alien Sky, from #11 to #23. Here is my youtube playlist, which I actually recommend watching in full:
v=nw_YoinTgfc&list=PLKlF2aI12k TYNfpueHT00OSMOQJ0T-n3I&index= 22
Of course, the video is just a quick glimpse of the vast library of mytho-historical-symbolical evidence available. If any anyone wants to get serious, there are voluminous publications discussing this with much greater detail.So we have this PC idea that seemingly explains very simply a big part of the hundreds of universal agreements between the ancient cultures and is seemingly supported by increasing amounts of evidence from the hard sciences, like for example what I mentioned today regarding Venus, Mars, comets being pieces of planets excavated by the “thunderbolts of the gods”, etc.If you are challenging the proto-planetary basis of the reconstruction (for example, when claiming that The Bull of Heaven archetype has nothing to do with planets), then you have the burden of at least showing how all those archetypes (and Venus as Mother Goddess, Mars as Warrior / Hero, etc.), all of which are global patternsthat seem to be easily explained by the PC hypothesis, could be also explained by a completely different hypothesis / model where extra-solar stars such as Taurus are the gods (remember that the bull of heaven was a deity).And this is actually only a relatively minute part of the whole colossal burden, as I briefly tried to explain in my previous email, e.g. if we humans were here for so long and with very high levels of sophistication, where’s the overwhelming evidence from all the branches of science converging to such a very radical proposal?
Again, I am not an expert by any means, so please do not believe me! Anyway, I need to focus on my thing… This topic is too exciting for me, please stop! LOL
I’m currently studying Collective Electrodynamics by one of my heroes, Carver Mead. If you want to switch a bit into Physics, I highly recommend watching this lecture:
It was great speaking with you guys today, have a good night!
On 12 September 2017 at 01:37, Jim Weninger <email@example.com> wrote:I should have just posted a picture:
http://l7.alamy.com/zooms/ f16a3a4c14a6428a80a7fda5497938 5a/taurus-constellation- zodiac-1822-hrnx1j.jpgNote the ecliptic, compared to the horns. This event of the sun passing between the horns happens even now.To misinterpret the Bull of Heaven as a solar system object/configuration, would be to throw out all the important information that has been passed down on ages. All ages defined as the point of entrance of the sun into a particular sign. As in, “when the sun comes to the first point of Aries on the Vernal equinox….”From: Jim Weninger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: Juan Calsiano <email@example.com>; “firstname.lastname@example.org” <email@example.com>; jhafner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: Taurus History
And just to get Taurus the bull out from where it should not be: the sun in Taurus is the figure of the bull with the sun between its horns. If we do not take it out of context as some catastrophists do, we find that the sun in Taurus, depicted as bull with sun between its horns, was depicted as a time marker.
I’ll quote from “Star Lore” by William Tyler Olcott,”the sun in Taurus was deified under the symbol of the bull…and is seen in the ruins of Egypt and Assyria” and “the Persians also were worshippers of the bull…and designated successive signs of the Zodiac by letters….with them A stands for Taurus…indicating that they considered the Bull the first sign of the zodiac” and “in fact in all the ancient zodiacs that have come down to us Taurus apparently began the year, and it seems to have been regarded as a Bull in all of the ancient Mediterranean cultures”
Also”the bull was an important object of worship with the Druids, and their great Tauric festival was held when the sun entered this constellation”
The point is merely that we can see that the bull and sun between the bulls horns was a symbol used even in the earliest ages to denote a constellation and our “time” within it.
I am not arguing against a polar alignment of planets, but not ALL mythology is about this one event. Especially when we have clear written records that do say what this figure was all about.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 8:10 PM, Jim Weninger <email@example.com> wrote:
> http://www.astrology-zodiac- signs.com/history/taurus/
> This would suggest that it was in Babylonian times that Taurus was first identified as the “Bull of Heaven”.
> I’ll try to search for a better reference
Great conversation last week.
It was great to meet up on Skype today.
Here are a few references from the conversation:
24,000 cycle – Esoteric
Also find included, some info on the Solvay Conferences – (wanted to check it out)
Have a great week, I’ll touch base over the weekend.